[ Website for course is at www.NationalSecurityLaw.net -- Click for Home Page ]
"National Security Law -- Law & Policy Issues" -- Dr. Stuart Malawer.
ASSIGNMENTS -- CLASS SCHEDULE.
[Spring 2008 assignments below are from the casebook and document book -- Moore & Turner, National Security Law (2005) and from Moore & Turner, National Security Law Documents 2006. For Fall 2009 assignments will be from Stuart Malawer, U.S. National Security Law -- Sourcebook of Cases, Laws, Treaties & Documents (Hein & Co. ) (2009). The following assignments will be adjusted prior to class.]
Rasul v. Bush (S. Ct. June 2004).
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld. (S. Ct. June 2004).
Rumsfeld v. Padilla. (S. Ct. June 2004).
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (S. Ct. 2006).
Boumediene v. Bush (S. Ct. 2008). [Edited case.]
Munaf v. Geren (S. Ct. 2008). [Edited case.]
*"Summary of Six S. Ct. Cases." (Malawer).
Note --
"Extraterritoriality & U.S. Criminal Law." (CRS 2006).
Update --
The Supreme Court ruled that the ICJ judgment (Avena) under the Statute of the ICJ (Article 36) and Article 1(Compulsory Jurisdiction) Optional Protocol to the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (1963) did not become domestic law within the U.S. This is because the Optional Protocol is non-self-executing. Congress needs to enact implementing legislation. The President does not have law-making authority to declare a treaty binding on states. His actions fall within Justice Jackson's third category -- a Presidential action is invalid when it is contra to Congressional intent. (The intent is inferred from Congressional inaction to passage of implementing legislation.) This is the situation even thought the U.S. might be in violation of its international obligations due to the operation of the principles of separation of powers and federalism. This case involves issues of foreign policy, international relations and international law. "Justices Rule Against Bush on Death Penalty Case." New York Times (March 25, 2008). Medellin v. Texas (Opinion of the S. Ct. , Syllabus, March 25, 2008). Medellin v. Texas (2008) (Edited).
- U.S. Supreme Court & International Law.
- "International Law, Foreign Law & the Supreme Court." (Speech by Attorney General Gonzales, U.S. Dept. of Justice, November 9, 2005).
- “Citing Foreign Law.” Washington Post (3.21.06) (not international law).
- President & International Law.
- Newer arguments concerning the President and international law in the Bush Administration. "Law & Foreign Policy -- John Yoo." Wall Street Journal (9.13.05).
- "John Yoo -- Series of Administration Memos on Torture, Executive Power & Wiretapping." (New York Times (12.23. 2005).
- "Jack Goldsmith -- Conscience of a Conservative." New York Times Magazine (9.9.07).
- Update --
- "For Justice, Another Day on Detainees." New York Times (12.03.07).
- "New Case to be Decided by S. Ct. -- U.S. Citizens Held in Iraq." Washington Post (12.08.07).
- "Three International Cases Pending Before S. Ct." Wall Street Journal (1.07.08).
- Issue of citing foreign law in S. Ct. decisions and the declining reliance on S. Ct. decisions in foreign cases is discussed at "U.S. Courts and Foreign Nations." New York Times (9.18.08). "U.S. Law & Foreign Law -- Letters to the Editor." (New York Times (9.20.08).
- Argues that Europe does not observe international law any better than the U.S. and that states only observe international law only when it serves national interests. Goldsmith "Europe and International Law." Wall Street Journal (11.25.08).
- The former Secretary for Homeland Security argues the relevance of international law to U.S. foreign policy. "Responsibility to Contain." Foreign Affairs (Jan. / Feb. 2009).
- Executive Agreements & Global Governance." New York Times (January 5, 2009).
- Chapter 31 -- "Homeland Security."
- Flynn, "Home Front Security." Foreign Affairs (Sept. / Oct. 2004).
- U.S.A. Patriot Act (2001).
- "Patriot Act Reauthorization in Brief." (GAO 2005).
- "Libraries & Patriot Act." (CRS Aug. 2005).
- Chapter 29 -- "Information Warfare & Critical Infrastructure."
- Chapter 30 -- "Federal Emergency Preparedness."
- Doc. 6.6 -- "Posse Comitatus Act. "Posse Comitatus Act (1878).
- Doc. 5.68 -- "Stafford Disaster Relief & Emergency Assistance Act."
- "Federal Stafford Act." (CRS 2005).
Insurrection Act -- Title 10 U.S. Code, Ch. 15, Sec. 331-336.
"Use of Federal Troops for Disaster Assistance -- Legal Issues." (CRS Sept. 2005).
* Boumediene v. Bush (S. Ct. 2008). [Edited case.]
* Munaf v. Geren (S. Ct. 2008). [Edited case.]
"Next Supreme Court Case -- Bagram Air Base (Afghanistan)." Washington Post (6.29.08).
![[war cases]](Assign1.gif)
Wall Street Journal (6.26.08)
Note --
- * Review of J. Moore, Civil Litigation Against Terrorism." (2004).
- * "Lautenberg Amendment -- Victims & Terrorist Assets." New York Times (4.22.08).
- "Private Litigation & Torture Memos." New York Times (March 7, 2009); "Litigation -- Bush Lawyers & Terror War." New York Times (3.9.09).
Note -- Extraterritoriality & Government Contractors.
"Potential CIA Liability for Torture." New York Times (9.16.06).
"New Law & Military Trials for Contractors." Washington Post (1/16/07).
** "Private Security Contractors under Domestic & International Law." (ASIL 12.26.07).
* Update -- Private Sector Contractors -- Exemption from DOJ Reporting." New York Times (4.27.08).
- "Terrorism & National Security -- Trends & Issues." (CRS 2006).
- "Contractor Fraud in Iraq -- Custer Battles." Washington Post (Feb. 9, 2007).
- "Contractors -- Legal Loopholes in Iraq-- Editorial." New York Times (11.05.07).
- * "Military Bill Veto & Private Suits Against Iraq." New York Times (12.29.07).
- "Civil Suits Against Palestinian & War Against Terrorism." Washington Post (2.12.08).
- "National Security & Law Suits -- State Secrets Protection Act." Washington Post (3.6.08).
- "Iraqi Sues U.S. Contractors (CACI) in U.S. Court for Torture in Iraq." Wall Street Journal (5.5.08).
- "Assistance for U.S. Victims of Overseas Terrorism." (USDOJ).
- "New Supreme Court Case -- Marri (Detention of Lawful Person)." New York Times (12.06.08).
- "New Supreme Court Case -- Iqbal (Liability of Officials)." New York Times (12.11.08).
Scorecard: Legality of the Bush Administration's National Security Policies.
[ Click here to Return to Home Page - www.NationalSecurityLaw.net ]